Sao Paulo you beauty! Triple UK gold crowned with best WorldSkills competitor first

Three golds were crowned with an illustrious first for TeamUK as beauty therapist Rianne Chester was handed the award for best overall WorldSkills competitor in a glorious night in Brazil.

The Albert Vidal award went jointly to the Warrington Collegiate learner (pictured above) — the first time the UK has ever won the prize — while a further four silver and two bronze medals went to her team-mates.

The gold achieved by the 21-year-old, who runs Beauty By Rianne, was equalled by TeamUK plumbing and heating competitor Gary Doyle, from Northern Ireland’s Southern Regional College and Kieran Trainor Plumbing and Heating and also 21.

And the skills of 21-year-old Chichester College learner Edward Harringman, who works for Harringman Cabinet Making, meant the gold achieved by fellow cabinet maker George Callow, who also went to Chichester College, two years ago in WorldSkills Leipzig was retained.

Silvers went to the UK landscape gardening team of 21-year-olds Matthew Beesley, from Cheshire’s Reasheath College and Beesley Landscapes, and Jonathan Gill, from Northern Ireland’s College of Agriculture, Food and Rural Enterprise and Jonathan Gill Landscapes.

The third silver was claimed by UK’s 24-year-old aircraft maintenance competitor Shayne Hadland, who trains with RAF Cosford and works at RAF Benson. He also walked off with the best in nation award, while the fourth silver went to 21-year-old Christopher Bailie, from South Eastern Regional College and BL Refrigeration and AC Limited, in refrigeration and air conditioning.

The UK bronze medals were won by 20-year-old architectural stonemason Sam Turner, from York College and The Dean and Chapter of York Minster, and 22-year-old car painter Rebecca Wilson, from Northern Ireland’s Riverpark Training and CM Accident Repair Centre.

[slideshow_deploy id=’38884′]

Skills Minister Nick Boles offered his congratulations to the team, whose performance at Sao Paulo across four days of intense competition could get even better with medallions of excellence — awarded when competitors miss out on the top three spots, but hit scores of internationally-recognised standards — yet to be given out.

The haul of nine podium place medals, handed out at the Ibirapuera Gymnasium, was two up on WorldSkills Leipzig two years ago, when Team UK claimed two golds, one silver and three bronze, along with 17 medallions of excellence.

Skills Minister Boles said: “Congratulations to Team UK on its impressive medals tally and achievement at WorldSkills São Paulo.

“Their hard work shows how far apprenticeships and professional and technical training can take young people, and the skills they are learning will help drive them towards an exciting and rewarding career.”

best of best
Albert Vidal award-winners Rianne Chester and automobile technicians Jeong Woo Seo, from Korea, and Luis Carlos Sanchez Machado, from Brazil

The evening included traditional Brazilian music and dancers, plus a retrospective video looking back at the entire competition, and there was also a video about Abu Dhabi, the host city for the 44th WorldSkills Competition in 2017.

The final award of the evening was the Albert Vidal prize, which Rianne shared with automobile technicians Jeong Woo Seo, from Korea, and Luis Carlos Sanchez Machado, from Brazil.

Carole Stott, chair of Find a Future, which manages the UK’s entry into the WorldSkills competition, said: “WorldSkills São Paulo gave Team UK the opportunity to showcase the UK’s vocational and FE system on a global stage.

“The hard work they have all put in over the last two years to prepare for the competition, alongside their committed training managers has really paid off and we are thrilled with the results they have achieved.

“We urge the nation to join us celebrating the success of Team UK and give them a champions’ welcome on their return.”

 

Landscape gardener Matthew Beesley pays WorldSkills credit to mum and dad

Whether WorldSkills Sao Paulo results in a medal or not for Matthew Beesley, one thing he will be taking away is the knowledge of just how important his mum and dad have been to his competition journey.

The 21-year-old (pictured above, right) TeamUK landscape gardener, from Cheshire’s Reaseheath College, said while all the attention focused on him in Brazil, much of the credit for his success in making it to the competition lies with David and Wendy Beesley.

Matthew actually employs his dad part-time “in the backroom” of his Beesley’s Landscapes business, with David having semi-retired as an engineer five years ago.EOB_2757

The help allowed Matthew to remain a success both in business and in competition.

“My mum and dad don’t half dig out for me,” said Matthew, who is competing with Jonathan Gill (pictured above, left), from Northern Ireland’s College of Agriculture, Food and Rural Enterprise (Cafre).

“They work so hard behind the scenes. They don’t really get recognised for what they do.

“I tend to get all the limelight, but behind the scenes they are working so hard to keep the business running while I’m off here, there and everywhere trying to compete for this competition, so credit where it’s due — to them.”

It’s an arrangement that allows David’s experience and approach to complement that of his son’s.

“Matthew is a 120mph kid — he wants to do things today,” he said.

“WorldSkills has tempered that in one respect and taught him the skills to go at that sort of pace.

“Where Matthew is a blue sky thinker, I’m a bit more reserved and between us we complement each other.

“But WorldSkills has definitely taught Matthew the finer side of his skills and the trade. He’s a much better person at it. He’s developed as a good all-rounder.

“He’s only 21, but he already wants to set up his own academy so he can rain people in landscaping and they can get a recognised qualification — that’s what his dream is.”

Matthew first got involved in WorldSkills four years ago and admits to having gone through big changes personally.

“My approach when I first got involved with WorldSkills when I was 17 was arrogant — I thought I knew it all and no one could tell me anything,” he said.

“But since then I’ve learned to appreciate that when someone tells you something, you’ve got to just sit back and think they might have done it a lot longer than you have. They are just trying to make you better as a person and it’s started to pay off.”

He added: “The biggest thing that I’ve learned is that you never stop learning. There’s always stuff to learn — always stuff to improve on.”

Mum Wendy has noticed the change too.

“He’s developed himself — he doesn’t get fazed,” she said.

“He’s not worried about any of this at all. We printed out the diagrams for this competition and David and I just looked at them confused, but Matthew just said: ‘Yeah, that’s fine’.”

But Matthew was also keen to pay tribute to the work of his training manager, Colin McKnight (pictured above main, centre), from Cafre.

“I’ve known him for four years so we get on more like friend — he can say something to me and I can say something to him and we won’t be offended. It’s water off a duck’s back.

“We know each other really well and have grown to be quite fond of each other.”

Day 2 WorldSkills | TeamUK competitor’s shipments of Brazilian plaster and months of training in attempt for gold

Some ingenious thinking about the difference between British and Brazilian plaster could lead TeamUK competitor Robert Johnson to gold.

The Redcar & Cleveland College 22-year-old had 80 bags of the stuff shipped to the UK from South America to make sure there were no nasty plaster-based surprises.

WorldSkillsUK stalwart Peter Moore, Robert’s training manager, who works for Construction Skills Academy, was behind the brainwave and it may just have put TeamUK on a footing with plastering and drywall systems long-term achievers Germany.

Robert Johnson- Plastering and Dry Wall Systems at Team UK Selection 2015, WorldSkills Sao Paulo 2015
Robert Johnson- Plastering and Dry Wall Systems at Team UK Selection 2015, WorldSkills Sao Paulo 2015

Robert, who works for dad Peter’s Classic Plaster Moulds firm, told FE Week last night at the end of day two of competition: “The first two days of competition have been tough. There have been a few changes made but nothing that has affected my game.

“Tomorrow we start with the Brazilian plaster, which I’ve been practicing with at home — we got a ton shipped over for me two months ago to practice with. We had about 80 bags and I got through half of it.

“In Brazil the plaster is very different with a longer set time, because using our plaster in this heat it would just dry straight away. It’s different to use and so I’ve had to learn a totally different technique to use it.

“On familiarisation day I didn’t try it out because I didn’t want to give any techniques away because I know how to use it — others don’t.

“But the German competitor was the only other one who didn’t try it either and they win it every year, so they’ve done the same I think. I’ve seen his work and, again, they’re good.”

He added: “No one wins with 100 per cent at my skill, but I’d put my score so far at 98 per cent — I lost out on just two measurements, which is a common fault. But that’s a personal best so I can’t complain.”

There was also a positive view on TeamUK progress over at architectural stonemasonry, where 20-year-old Sam Turner was giving credit to his training manager, Kevin Calpin (pictured top), from Calpin Associates.

“I’m really happy with where I am today [end of day two]. My timing is really good. Yesterday was just as good. Everything’s been spot on with my training and where I need to be,” said Sam, from York College and who works at The Dean and Chapter of York Minster.

“There are three modules to the task — there are templates that are cut out of aluminium sheet, the second module is a letter and carving module then third is a masonry module which is similar to a column.

“The masonry is the hardest — it’s got a lot of marks in it and a lot of work. I started it yesterday and it’s got to be finished by 2pm on Saturday. I saw the plans before then but there was a 30 per cent change — but they made it easier if anything.

“My training manager’s pushed me, but it’s what I’ve needed to get me here.”

Story banner

 

SFA moratorium on approval of new qualifications will ’cause havoc’ warns sector chief

The Skills Funding Agency (SFA) will enforce a “moratorium” on the approval of qualifications until plans to “simplify and align” the public funding system are unveiled in the autumn.

It issued a notice to awarding organisations today stating that it will “put in place a moratorium on any further approvals for the funding year 2015 to 2016”, after the September approvals windows closes and the updated simplified funding rates catalogue is published on October 1.

The decision to enforce a moratorium was criticised by the Federation of Awarding Bodies (FAB).

Stephen Wright (pictured right), FAB chief executive, said that the “uncertainty will halt development work and the delay in funding decisions will cause havoc with provider and awarding bodies’ planning for 2016/17”.Stephen-Wright

The SFA notice added: “Simultaneously, we will begin work on how to simplify and align the [qualifications] offer better, so that for the funding year 2016 to 2017 it is coherent and seamless for learners aged 19 to 23.

“We will also look at how to introduce further flexibilities for learning provided at lower levels, better enabling providers to respond directly to the priorities their localities have identified. We will say more about this in the autumn.”

However, it said that the moratorium would not apply to groups of qualifications that are approved automatically — for example, new tech levels and technical certificates approved through the Department for Education process for inclusion of vocational qualifications in performance tables.

Also exempted, it added, would be “vocational qualifications at levels three and four, which we will only approve for 24+ advanced learning loans”.

Charlotte Bosworth (pictured below left), director of skills and employment at OCR, said that it was “poor timing”.

Charlotte-BosworthShe added that the moratorium would create “a barrier to the efficient development and deployment of innovative, industry-led qualifications”.

A number of awarding organisations complained to FE Week on March 30 about uncertainties caused by the SFA’s decision to delay confirming whether hundreds of qualifications would be publicly-funded next academic year.

The SFA said at the time that it had been forced to split the process of notifying the sector about which qualifications would be exempted from the public funding axe due to a “high volume of submissions” from AOs making the case for continued funding.

It was originally supposed to confirm how many of all 779 submissions had been approved for funding on April 1, but awarding organisations were told to expect delays for hundreds of entry and level one, plus QCF English and maths submissions.

After learning of the latest SFA announcement on the moratorium, assistant chief executive of Association of Colleges Julian Gravatt said: “We have proposed that the SFA should find ways to decouple adult FE funding from qualifications to help simplify the funding process at a time when this particular budget is in freefall.”

“There’s not a lot of point in SFA increasing the number of qualifications approved for funding as there isn’t any spare cash to fund them,” he added.

Stewart Segal, chief executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, said that his organisation supported “the need to simplify and stabilise the qualification approval process but that must not be at the expense of customer demand”.

He added: “Following the announcement of the changes to qualification approval, it will be important that there are opportunities for awarding bodies and training providers to respond to employer and learner needs by developing new or adapting existing qualifications.”

 

National training provider and major retailer both ‘inadequate’ says Ofsted

A national training provider has plummeted from an Ofsted outstanding rating to inadequate, while employer provider Next has also been told its apprenticeships aren’t up to scratch in inspection reports published today.

The education watchdog also found that the Marine Society College of the Sea had made “reasonable progress” since getting a grade four in November.

Training provider CADCentre, headquartered in Swansea, was handed a grade four in all headline areas following the inspection in early July — a stark contrast to the overall grade one it achieved in its last inspection in 2007.

On Ofsted’s most recent visit, inspectors said: “Procedures for the safe recruitment of new staff are weak, too few learners on classroom-based and workplace learning courses successfully complete their programme.”

They also said too few of the providers apprentices, the majority of which are 19 plus, completed their courses in the planned time.

They also said learners, especially the more able, were not encouraged to develop their skills above the bare minimum.

“The curriculum does not meet the needs of learners and employers well enough,” they said, adding this had inhibited learners’ ability to find jobs locally.

The 1,632-learner provider had a £2.2m contract with the Skills Funding Agency to deliver in administration, business management, ICT and classroom assistants apprenticeships, classroom-based employability programmes and other workplace ICT courses.

No-one from CADCentre was available to comment.

Clothing retailer Next was also slapped with an inadequate grading in the first inspection of its delivery of 786 level two retail and call centre apprenticeships.

Following the inspection in early July, inspectors said the safeguarding at the high street chain, which has a £1.5m SFA contract, was inadequate — a grade they also awarded to Next in all headline areas.

They added: “Too many apprentices withdraw from their learning — the support provided for them is inadequate and does not ensure that they remain on their apprenticeship to complete their qualification.”

The report also said learners did not “fully understand” what would be demanded of them on the apprenticeship, due to insufficient advice and guidance.

It added that apprentices did not receive enough assessment of or support with their maths and English skills, and issued a damning verdict on the company’s training leaders and managers, saying they “have failed to realise their vision of enabling all apprentices to excel in their studies and at work”.

However, the report identified the “considerable investment in developing the training team” by the company’s board and directors as a strength.

A Next spokesperson said: “We are very disappointed with our first Ofsted inspection.

“We completely accept the report’s findings and recommendations. We have commenced a vigorous programme of improvements and aim to make significant progress within the next six months.”

An SFA spokesperson said in the case of both providers the agency was “considering the published Ofsted report in line with our Intervention process” which could lead to CADCentre losing its contract.

Ofsted was more positive in the report of the Marine Society’s College of the Sea’s third monitoring visit, which also took place at the beginning of last month.

In the report published last Friday, inspectors said the college, which offers distance learning for sailors, had made “reasonable progress” in increasing the number of learners completing their GCSE and A-level programmes, improving use of data to monitor learner progress, ensuring their courses were suitable for the maritime industry and improving safeguarding.

The college’s director of lifelong learning, Mark Windsor said: “We’re pleased that Ofsted recognise the hard work that we are doing to improve, but we recognise that there’s more to do and we’re committed to achieving that.”

The 2014 Ofsted inspection, which prompted a visit from FE Commissioner David Collings, criticised its subcontractor, the National Extension College (NEC).

In the monitoring visit report, inspectors noted: “Managers are now monitoring the performance of the current subcontractor and of their learners.

“The current sub-contractor is providing better learning programmes for new learners that include more frequent contact from the tutor — previously tutors relied on learners contacting them to ask for support.”

However, tenders for a new subcontractor to offer provision from September 2016 have been invited.

The SFA funded provision, worth £160,000, makes up only a small part of the college’s provision — accounting for 81 learners at the time of the inspection.

NEC chief executive Ros Morpeth said: “We are pleased that Ofsted have recognised in their recent re-inspection report that improvements have been made and that the learners are benefiting from the new arrangements.”

She said although NEC would not bid on the new contract, it would continue to support existing students.

 

The Skills Funding Agency declined to comment on the monitoring visit report.

 

Ofsted monitoring visit finds ‘reasonable’ level of improvement for learners at Lewisham Southwark College

Ofsted has recognised a “reasonable” level of improvement for learners in all areas in its latest monitoring visit report on Lewisham Southwark College.

The college, previously named Lesoco, became the first FE and skills provider to be branded inadequate by Ofsted twice in a row earlier this year.

In a report on an inspection in February, the college was criticised over the pace of improvement and a failure to raise standards after it was first given a grade four rating in January last year following a visit by inspectors in November 2013.

An initial Ofsted monitoring visit report published in May set out priorities for improvement, for example to the college’s curriculum planning, staff management, teaching and finances.

But a second monitoring visit report out today recognised “reasonable improvement for learners” in all areas.

Principal Carole Kitching (pictured right) said: “I am delighted that Ofsted has recognised that the hard work of our staff is resulting in improvementsCarole-Kitching-2w

across the board for all our students.

“I am determined that the pace of improvement will accelerate in the weeks to come with our all new permanent senior team now in place from some of the best colleges in the country.”

Today’s report recognised “reasonable” improvement in leadership and governance, curriculum management, sharing good practice English and mathematics provision, and learners’ attendance and punctuality.

The same applied, the report said, to the college’s efforts to ensure that “the curriculum offered meets the needs of the college’s target group for recruitment” and identify “the reasons behind the significant drop in learner numbers for 16- to 18-year-olds”.

“Senior leaders and governors have now completed the organisational review and the actions taken have successfully reduced the previously high staffing costs and brought the college in line with similar colleges,” the report said.

It stated that the number of curriculum managers had been reduced from 20 to 11 and “this smaller number of larger curriculum areas has enabled the senior management team to ensure that all curriculum areas now benefit from the skills and experience of the best managers”.

Meanwhile, it said that “the governing body now has the skills and experience it needs to provide a good level of challenge to the senior management team”.

For maths and English provision, it said that “the heads of both subjects are reporting directly to the head of teacher education and development to ensure that the development of these skills is at the heart of all teaching”.

It added that the timetabling of separate English and maths lessons had been centralised and formed “a core around which all other timetables have been built”.

“This will ensure that all learners have timetables which provide sufficient scope for the development of their skills,” the report said.

It praised new punctuality and attendance policies, but warned that “senior managers have not given enough thought about the quality assurance arrangements for registers and how they will evaluate the accuracy of the recording of lateness or absence”.

The inadequate Oftsed report in February for the general FE college, which had around 18,000 learners and Skills Funding Agency (SFA) allocation of almost £24m at the time, came after four Ofsted monitoring inspections since the initial inadequate rating.

Maxine Room OBE, principal and chief executive, LeSoCo.
Maxine Room OBE, principal and chief executive, LeSoCo.

A second visit last July followed the departure of former principal Maxine Room (pictured left) and the appointment of ex-Warwickshire College principal and former 157 Group chair Ioan Morgan to the position of interim principal.

An FE Week story in May also revealed that FE Commissioner Dr David Collins was overseeing a structure and appraisal review of the college, at the same time as nearby Greenwich Community College.

A BIS spokesperson also revealed at the time that the two colleges entered into “discussions” about possible closer collaboration with each other, although FE Week now understands that a merger between the two is unlikely.

Few big ideas for FE and skills

With the winner of the Labour leadership contest set to be announced on September 12, Mick Fletcher analyses how well each candidate understands the challenges facing FE and considers their different visions for the sector.

It is no surprise that the Labour leadership contenders are strongly critical of the Conservative and coalition record on FE.

Though expressed in different ways, however, their critiques of government policy (published online in the FE Experts section) give no basis for choosing between them, nor of gauging their potential impact on the sector were they to ever gain the keys to Number 10.

For those purposes one needs to ask firstly whether their comments show an understanding of the FE and Skills system and secondly whether their proposals for reform seem credible.

On the initial test Andy Burnham paints the most limited picture of FE; for him it all seems to be about apprenticeships, positioned as an alternative to higher education.

He talks of raising the status of technical education but gives few clues that he understands what, other than apprenticeships, it consists of.

Yvette Cooper is little better, mentioning lifelong learning, and also the need for a broad education for young people but not seriously engaging with either.

Liz Kendall shows a clearer understanding of FE, recognising its role in adult education and lifelong learning as well as working with employers to deliver apprenticeships.

Jeremy Corbyn too has a wider view. He is the only one to highlight the important potential synergies between FE and Job Centre Plus and to stress the links with productivity.

Although they condemn Conservative cuts, neither Cooper nor Kendall give any idea about how they might be reversed.

In the current climate that is dangerously close to leaving FE where it is, to fight (and probably lose) a battle against the competing claims of health, schools and pensions.

Burnham has a big idea — a graduate tax — which may be an appealing way of relieving student debt without bankrupting higher education, but it is not clear how this would fund apprenticeships as well, let alone the FE system in all its current complexity.

Only Corbyn has credible proposals for finance; his 2 per cent increase in corporation tax, hypothecated to fund adult FE is not that dissimilar to George Osborne’s proposed levy on big businesses designed to fund apprenticeships.

The Treasury won’t like it any more than a hypothecated training levy and big business will like it less because they can’t get it back but it could be done.

Yvette Cooper has the most credible proposal for boosting apprenticeships; using the power of public procurement to require businesses to invest in training.

Liz Kendall’s suggestion for greater involvement of the trades unions is interesting, and could have been strengthened if she had made the link with the social partnership approach underpinning the German model she admires.

In contrast Andy Burnham’s suggestion of a Ucas-type system for apprenticeships seems to betray an imperfect understanding of how the system actually works.

Contracts of employment with training, offered intermittently at different levels by thousands of employers cannot be brigaded neatly in the same way as annual offers of broadly similar programmes to broadly similar students by a limited number of higher education institutions.

Three out of the four candidates refer to devolution.

Liz Kendall and Yvette Cooper talk of provision being shaped locally, or devolved to cities and county regions — no great change from current policies on skills.

Jeremy Corbyn’s approach seems rather different, calling for colleges to work with employers to accredit apprenticeships. If the words ‘national colleges’ had been used however this would also represent policy continuity rather than change.

The most surprising feature of the four essays perhaps is that each of the candidates seems to miss some potentially wide open goals.

The lack of impartial careers advice for example is a standing reproach to current policy.

The imminent destruction of excellent provision in sixth form colleges is another.

One can’t expect too much detail in a short piece on a specialised topic from a potential party leader, but the apparent reluctance to move too far from vague soundbites suggest that FE lobbyists will have their work cut out whichever candidate finally emerges on top.