The government is considering extending the FE loans system to cover level two qualifications and more learners as it looks to make 19 to 23-year-olds who don’t move up a level pay full course costs.

The system currently applies to learners aged at least 24 and studying at level three or four — but a government consultation proposes FE loans should also apply to younger learners that remain at level two or three.

Government pays half the course cost for 19 to 23-year-olds staying at levels two and three, but learners would end up having to repay the full cost under the loans system.

However, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) believes removing the need to pay half up front will allow more people to be able to access learning.

Skills Minister Matthew Hancock said: “Through helping FE learners access the finance to support their studies, we’re enabling people to develop the vital skills that will allow them to begin a prosperous and productive career.

“That’s why we are proposing to build on and develop the system so that it can benefit even more learners.”

But National Union of Students president Toni Pearce has warned the government risks saddling learners with “huge debts”.

She said: “It is tragic to think that those who were failed by the education system first time round could end up saddled with huge debts at just nineteen, when they are simply trying to give themselves another shot at a future by gaining qualifications as basic as GCSEs or A-levels.

“Debt can be a major deterrent [from] study for those from lower income backgrounds. This loan policy means that the full cost of education is put on the individual.

“I don’t know what the governments is thinking — its own research has previously shown that two thirds of learners wouldn’t take out a loan to study.”

Concerns have also been raised by Sally Hunt, the general secretary of the University and College Union, who said: “We will be studying these proposals in detail and responding formally to the consultation.

“My first reaction, though, is one of great concern at any additional financial burden being placed on students. Ever since 24+ advanced learning loans were introduced, the sector has feared that it was the ‘thin end of the wedge’ and now, it seems, we were right.

“The government should be doing everything in its power to make education more appealing, and encouraging more young people to take up new training in order to gain qualifications and skills for their future. We need more help for students, not more debt.”

The proposals come after apprenticeship were removed from the system after just 404 applications in around seven months up to Christmas.

Government figures in March showed the provisional number of 25-plus apprenticeship starts for the first half of the academic year plummeted from 93,300 last year to 49,100.

A BIS spokesperson said: “It was clear from application and starts data that 24+ advanced learning loans were not the preferred route for employers or prospective apprentices.”

The government’s consultation, which also looks at bringing higher national certificates and diplomas under the FE loans systems, closes on August 21.

It also considering introducing FE loans comply with Sharia Law — which forbids the payment of interest.

A government response is expected in the autumn, with changes to be introduced for 2016/17.

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply to Country Bumpkin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. Debbie Cordwell

    I wish we would stop describing young people as being failed by the education system before they reach FE. Schools do some fantastic work. We could learn a lot from them.

  2. FELecturer

    An enthusiastic government supporter said “Everything is going according to plan. By 2020 14-19 student loans will be in place and by 2030 children age 5 to 13 will benefit from the first primary school loans. Young people simply can’t expect to get all this education for nothing.”

    He continued “Most young people leaving school at 18 or 19 will only owe £50k-£60k which will be easy to pay back over 50 or 60 years. If young people continue studying at university they will still only end up with debts of about £150,000. We will put in measures to help those who struggle to pay back their loan, we will ensure they have FREE board and lodgings in their local workhouse.”

  3. Stephem Urquhart

    I do wonder if the 16-19 years olds will be receive the same helpful information that I also did from my local college regarding the loan finding system. This in particular for courses that will not be attracting funding. I was informed that as the Level 3 course I wanted to undertake did not attract any funding that I would be ineligible to apply for a 24+ loan fund.

    As I am now haing to train in a new career field due to disability, I do wonder how i am supposed to find the £1,000+ fess to undertake the study necessary to become a viable tax payer again? At present I am only eligible for Contributions based ESA and still have to pay for all living costs in full on £77 per week and found it amazing that this was the case. I am concerned that there are going to be a number of school leavers who are going to unjustly penalised when trying to make their way forwards in life with a system that is heavily against supporting those who do not take a traditional route with further education and instead take the vocational ‘earn while you learn route’.

  4. Country Bumpkin

    Why on earth have they been using applications data to make the case L3 loans were successful. A more honest method would be to use starts data and adjusting by those predicted not to pay.
    As a provider we had many more applications than starts and won’t even reach 30% of our loans allocation, yet next years allocation hs gone up by 40% as they’ve been using applications data not starts on that too. As far as I know a provider cannot cancel a learners applciation and a learner turned off by a loan just leaves it hanging…..
    Still, a very useful wheeze for making it look successful.

  5. david kaandi

    surely the best measure of success is to wait until those having taken a loan are repaying – if at all- and what successful career outcomes they have had as a result of the course undertaken.

    or is this far too long to wait in political campaign life terms?